Cafcass Bewertungen 

1'512
TrustScore 1 von 5

1.1

Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren

Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren

Das sagen Bewerter

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Minus 5 stars … where in a child’s childhood absolute disgusting unbelievable don’t follow the rules slap – and have too much weight in court!. condescending!. lack of knowledge of domestic abuse!

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

This is my third attempt at making a review with Cafcass having complained about my previous two. D**n from Cafcass in Leeds makes one sided biased reports then lies under oath claiming i... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Based in London, Holborn and Barnet, I feel she was biased from the beginning, she was old friends with the court advisor whom advised the magistrates. I a the parental grandmother, of whom the family... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

If I could give 0 stars then I would. The officer that dealt with our case was bias, she ignored crucial evidence regarding safeguarding and domestic abuse, ALL of her reports contained fictitious inf... Mehr ansehen

Unternehmensdetails

Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen

We look after the interests of children in family courts. For guidance on how we use Twitter please see our community guidelines https://t.co/TINdGnEieZ 🙂


Kontaktinformationen

1.1

Ungenügend

TrustScore 1 von 5

1512 Bewertungen

5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen

Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.

Hat keine negativen Bewertungen beantwortet

So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot

Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.

1.1

Alle Bewertungen

(1'512)

157 Bewertungen in den letzten 12 Monaten

Bewertung abgeben
Unternehmen auf Trustpilot dürfen keine finanziellen oder anderweitigen Anreize oder Gegenleistungen für das Verbergen von Bewertungen anbieten. Bewertungen spiegeln die Meinung einzelner Nutzer wider und nicht die von Trustpilot. Mehr erfahren

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Disgrace of a service

Disgrace of a service. Specifically, Nottingham City are untrustworthy, bias and extremely prejudice. This government agency should be shut down with immediate effect.

5. Januar 2026
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Absolutely disgraceful – CAFCASS failed me and my daughter

Absolutely disgraceful – CAFCASS failed me and my daughter

I am utterly appalled by the way CAFCASS has handled my case. Despite being a loving and committed parent, they have completely blocked me from seeing my own daughter, with no fair justification. Their process felt biased, rushed, and lacked any genuine understanding of the emotional impact on both myself and my child.

At no point did I feel listened to. The officer assigned to my case made assumptions, ignored key evidence, and showed zero interest in maintaining a father-daughter relationship that has now been cruelly severed. There was no balance, no empathy, and certainly no accountability.

This system is supposed to protect children’s best interests – instead, it’s tearing families apart. CAFCASS has inflicted irreparable emotional damage, and it is shocking that a public service can wield this much power with so little oversight.

Something needs to change. There MUST be an independent investigation into how CAFCASS operates and how many families are being failed just like mine. The voices of countless parents like me are being ignored, and our children are suffering as a result.

Do not trust this system to protect your relationship with your child. It’s broken.

1. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Time wasters

A totally vile, unprofessional corrupt organisation with no concern for tne child's best interest

18. Juli 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Manipulated both mum and myself, and lied, injected their own opinions with NO EVIDENCE

Posting under a false name because I don’t know what they’re capable of.
0 stars isn’t an option. Recently attended court with the mother of my children to pass a consent order that we BOTH agreed on. Now, our relationship together hadn’t been the best since splitting but we put our heads together and wanted to do the best by our children. We get along fine now. There was never any argument about who has the children, and where they live. We BOTH agreed on a plan prior to applying to the courts. During the phone calls (after CAFCASS inserted themselves into the situation), both sides were manipulated into explaining the “bad parts”. The mother of my children said the woman who spoke to her was inserting words into her mouth like Abuse, harassment etc, and that she did not say these words. Now I know when she’s lying and she was NOT. We were both shown a letter to the court from CAFCASS and we were both in disbelief when we read it. We both picked out the same things that were completely untrue!
During the hearing, we were handed a risk assessment. Again, in the court room, we both were disgusted at what was written down. They even injected their own opinion that I had “coerced” my children’s mum into making this court order! At NO point had either of us said this, in any way shape or form. They ARE OUT TO GET THE FATHERS. There is no doubt about it. Despite the judge giving us a chance to explain how we BOTH acted after things ended, to which we are both ashamed of, and have moved on from, CAFCASS still insisted that I am to be stopped from seeing my children for a minimum of three months, despite the MOTHER saying I am NO risk to them whatsoever and she trusts me to have them (I have had them regularly since we sorted things out). I was told I would need to be monitored looking after my own children, they’d have to look into my past, interview family members etc. ludicrous. The judge questioned the validity of their reports after both the MOTHER and FATHER agreed their reports are fabricated! Luckily the judge saw through the bull**** and thought our explanations of what happened were fair and honest, and that I am no risk. COMPLETELY IGNORED CAFCASS’ suggestions and granted us our agreement. We both smiled and left the court room elated. It could have been something completely different because of these EVIL, CORRUPT PEOPLE. They made me out to be the devil reincarnate and the children’s mum even had to step in to defend me in the court room. We were never pitted against each other but they were trying their best to make it seem that way! It ended up being us vs CAFCASS’s bull****. Official complaint coming from both of us! 😡😡😡

22. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Dealt with thes vile people during my…

Dealt with these vile people during my divorce 2018.its no surprise to see in 2025 they continue to be incompetent biased against the father and completely fail to put the needs of children first over the man hating rhetoric.

19. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Vile service

I’ve been invited by my barrister to pursue CAFCASS in a formal complaint and if needed within the court of law.

The report writer was incredibly skewed with her thought processes. Refused to hear from anyone other than the father, the child and myself. Had she have bothered to do so her report would have been very different.

Report writer also has no real understanding of EDI nor LGBTQIA+ within children. In fact went as far as to accuse of me of forcing it onto my child.

The report writer mainly relied on a report written 8 years prior by a colleague while I was still in recovery from domestic abuse. Report writer decided to start interviewing us and writing her report a meagre 12 days before it was due.

Also if you deep dive CAFCASS, you can tell they don’t care especially if you look up FOI requests etc. They’ve also refused to release their framework when requested.

29. Januar 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Not supporting the children

a custody battle via family court with CAFCASS “supporting” the children….
So far
Their report to the judge assumed guilt of the alleged offences (no charges have been made- because these are clearly false allegations to stop contact)
They “would not support” ANY contact with the children (despite having no previous record of any abuse in a 9 year relationship).
Told the case had been CLOSED!! when called to provide relevant information as to the welfare of the children. No information. No reason. Still no contact
Likely an admin error? Is that a good enough excuse?

12. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

JOKE

cafcass wrote their report. said a drug test of the mother wasnt necessary.
Therefore allowing the mother to avoid scrutiny by referring to cafcass recommendation.
Even though there was evidence provided to social services, the stepdown plan clearly stated no drug use when caring for child, no drug driving etc, a drug test was rejected during mediation, rejected again when asked by cafcass, they still said drug testing wasnt necessary, which allowing it to be rejected again in court. even though i offered to pay for it so there was no financial burden on the mother, and i clearly stated only moderate or heavy use.. not recreational. this is a class a drug im speaking about, and dependency.
Cafcass would rather the mother potentially put the child at risk rather than allow decisions be made based on a clear understanding of the situation, if it isnt beneficial to her to do so

10. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Someone Please start a petition to SHUT DOWN CAFCASS

If there was any real power in these review this agency would be shut down my LABOUR. It is an absolute JOKE.

After losing our Son, his wife stole the most second precious things in our lives, our grandchildren (WHO ARE NOW THE MOST PRECIOUS). We had this vile woman from CAFCASS who gave us a sense a security only to rape us after the interview and became JUDGE and JURY and decided our grandchildren who we raised could no longer been seen by us as their VILE mother claim we abused her. NO EVIDENCE provided and no matter how many videos and photos we showed of the mother being happy CAFCASS did not care AND STATED VIDOES AND PHOTOS PROVE NOTHING. Really, never mind the countless family friends and relatives who could support us, who were present and could give first hand accounts but once again the claim it was not relevant. We are guilty because we have no PR RIGHTS and mother said so!

We have to provided evidence at great cost but the mother has LEGAL AID (at tax payers expense) and gets away with accusing us with the world of allegations, and make sure the courts block us from going public. Well CAFCASS you are not fit for the service you provide and really should review your processes, you really do not care for the children, you focus has been the adults relationship. CAFCASS focused on all the false allegations of the mother without any supporting evidence. In court the judge discredited this CAFCASS, I will not name her, but this CAFCASS officier is VILE. Our barrister destroyed her evidence that she relied on then the Judge himself stopped our Barrister and question her directly. It was discovered that her bosses TOLD HER to make this decision.

We also discovered that the her bosses are not trained, they have no knowledge of how to deal with any form of physiologic issues with children, this CAFCASS official made claims that later during our contact with our grandchildren we 100% false which makes you think that she clearly was not telling us the truth as she claimed.

CAFCASS needs shutting down. We need to start a petition, they are not fit for purpose.

9. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Very descusting

Very descusting dragging a child threw court. Bridie. What a mess don't even think of what a child's needs are. My child even shown her face to face what his wishes was and then ignored it all. Then told by a dump of a solisiters threatens me with child servers don't trust them at all they don't cear about children who are cleared for they hate dads and think they know it all and then force me to pay over £2000 for a dump. Centre don't involve them at all saty well away of them pick on children who have a loving dad. But don't take cear of children who have parents who are drug addicts. Crack heads

8. Mai 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

CAFCASS ignore Parental Alienation

CAFCASS are worthy of missus five stars. By default CAFCASS obediently supported social services vexatious misinformation.
Please allow me to explain, at the beginning of this heart breaking ordeal GCC were in year four of Ofsted's special measures.
CAFCASS didn't bat an eyelid that GCC's Children's Social Services flawed Assessment had fallen fowl to a formal complaint, which was eventually upheld by GCC. All of which resulted in an offer of financial compensation and the orginal case social worker having their license to practise revoked by social work england. GCC then brought in two new workers to mop up their own mess. The first was a former probation officer, semi evangelical Christian with approx 18 months experience and another was from an outside agency. She was a former hairdresser with DIY tattoos and just 12 months experience.
CAFCASS took a entirely disingenuous and lazy approach. It was a truly barbaric and heartbreaking experience.
We spent almost 3 years in family court. I eventually discovered through FoI that although GCC wrote to us before court proceedings began explaining they had formally ended all involvement in the case. However, this didn't stop them directly emailed the CAFCASS case worker during court proceedings trying to influence the outcome.
I recieved 5 phone calls in total, some lasted up to 20 minutes from the case worker. We never met in person. CAFCASS interaction with the education services was literally a tick box questionnaire.
Despite their lack of diligence this didn't stop the CAFCASS case worker writing 30 pages of misinformation which surprise,surprise lent heavily on the the vindictive and misleading narrative from GCC. There were blatant examples of parental alienation before and during the family court case.
Throughout that time my parental rights were throw in the bin.
I implore anyone who becomes entangled with CAFCASS to tread very carefully. They are not your friend, they don't support or acknowledge that children can be victims of parental alienation. They couldn't care if you feel bereft. My advice is challenge them, if you feel they're misrepresenting you or your family.
In truth, it's a disfunctional process. 0It's also true they're overwhelmed by incredibly large case files. Consequently, they allow themselves to be compromised whilst looking for route of least resistance and they'll cut every corner to get there. Do they care that children need both parents, or if you never have an opportunity to see your child again, probably not.
Remember, don't be afraid to push back. Question them if they introduce heresay evidence. Tell them if you believe your child has been weaponised.
In all honesty, the service CAFCASS provide isn't fit for purpose. Its cruel and dehumanising process often resulted on brutal outcome for the children and their families.

2. April 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

I had a truly outstanding experience…

I had a truly outstanding experience with Cafcass. From start to finish, their team was professional, compassionate, and deeply knowledgeable about family dynamics and children’s needs.

The course I was enrolled in was incredibly insightful and supportive, providing tools that genuinely made a difference. I want to give special thanks to Miss Lynch, who went above and beyond. She took the time to understand and assess not only both parents, but also carefully analysed my child’s emotional well-being and individual needs.

Miss Lynch’s approach was thoughtful, child-focused, and rooted in empathy. She played a crucial role in helping both sides of the family come together for the benefit of our child. Thanks to her guidance, my child is now able to experience love, support, and a meaningful relationship with both parents and extended families.

For anyone going through the difficult process of family court and child arrangements, I wholeheartedly recommend Cafcass. Their work truly makes a lasting, positive difference in children’s lives.

17. Dezember 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Totally corrupt child abusers

Totally corrupt, child abusers, who lie, falsify reports, commit perjury, defame and slander.

Actively engage in parental alienation and disability discimination.

They are the main cause of harm to children in the UK, not any parent. They are in it for the money, power and access to vulnerable children, not to safeguard!

They actively engage in judicial fraud and corruption and are simply gatekeepers for the corrupt judicary and deep state.

I have evidence to back up everything I claim and some!

14. März 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Cafcass London vindictive

I came here to just have a look at what was presented about Cafcass and I am shocked that mainly one star and I thought I was the only one suffering but this tends to be the pattern.
Similarly, the section 7 report is completely biased and frames me as a bad parent by putting in false inaccuracies and omitting parts of the conversation of my response and not putting in key details in order to come to an end analysis, which is not in my favour. My problem is to listen to the inaccuracies and put the key details as well as my response to just create a fair picture and then come to your end and analysis. I don’t care what the end analysis is as long as my voice is heard and it was not it was framed for me to be a bad parent as I am the only Active parent so I have been very hurt by this and I will take it all the way to ombudsman and make sure she gets reprimanded or loses her position for the sake of everyone. This woman truly needs retraining. My son had to even point her in the right direction regarding her inaccuracies and she only changed one of them to please him. there definitely tends to be an underlying jealousy on her part and it’s very important as a trained professional you remove yourself from the situation. She has left me distraught and paralysed.

9. April 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I cant really go into details as I'm…

I cant really go into details as I'm raising a complaint. If your ex partner has involved CAFCASS be prepared for the worst. I haven't spoken to a single person or read a report that paints CAFCASS in a good light.
There is absolutely no regard placed on honesty, if your ex partner has lied about you, you can present as much as evidence as you want. It will be ignored, this is bank statement, Doctors reports, police reports all ignored.
I had to force the CAFCASS officer to read my ex-partners medical report from the court files. It was still largely ignored.
All i can advise is complain and keep escalating. Too many good parents are being forced to abide by a biased section 7 report. If the you have a section 7 report that you believe is wrong. Immediately contact the CAFCASS officer who wrote the report. Query the report, they wont change there mind. Then escalate to their manager, from there escalate to the CAFCASS complaints in slough. Be sure to chase the letter up within a week. They have 4 weeks to reply, in currently on week 12. From there escalate to your member of parliament and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).

Too many good people give up, it needs a concerted effort to get this horrible corrupt and biased organisation shut down

13. September 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

CAFCASS is Broken and Rotten

CAFCASS is a broken, rotten, dishonest and father-hating 'organisation' staffed by creatures who believe that they are above the law. I'm not a Trump fan, but this country could do with someone of his ilk (very briefly) to simply close it, as it (CAFCASS) does far more harm than good.

25. März 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung

So funktioniert Trustpilot

Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.

Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.

Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.

Hier ​finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.

Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.

Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.

Erfahren Sie mehr