Cafcass Bewertungen 

1'512
TrustScore 1 von 5

1.1

Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren

Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren

Das sagen Bewerter

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Minus 5 stars … where in a child’s childhood absolute disgusting unbelievable don’t follow the rules slap – and have too much weight in court!. condescending!. lack of knowledge of domestic abuse!

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

This is my third attempt at making a review with Cafcass having complained about my previous two. D**n from Cafcass in Leeds makes one sided biased reports then lies under oath claiming i... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Based in London, Holborn and Barnet, I feel she was biased from the beginning, she was old friends with the court advisor whom advised the magistrates. I a the parental grandmother, of whom the family... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

If I could give 0 stars then I would. The officer that dealt with our case was bias, she ignored crucial evidence regarding safeguarding and domestic abuse, ALL of her reports contained fictitious inf... Mehr ansehen

Unternehmensdetails

Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen

We look after the interests of children in family courts. For guidance on how we use Twitter please see our community guidelines https://t.co/TINdGnEieZ 🙂


Kontaktinformationen

1.1

Ungenügend

TrustScore 1 von 5

1512 Bewertungen

5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen

Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.

Hat keine negativen Bewertungen beantwortet

So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot

Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.

1.1

Alle Bewertungen

(1'512)

157 Bewertungen in den letzten 12 Monaten

Bewertung abgeben
Unternehmen auf Trustpilot dürfen keine finanziellen oder anderweitigen Anreize oder Gegenleistungen für das Verbergen von Bewertungen anbieten. Bewertungen spiegeln die Meinung einzelner Nutzer wider und nicht die von Trustpilot. Mehr erfahren

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

If I could give zero I would

If I could give zero I would. The cafcass lady from Coventry talked down to my partner and I like we were small children. We were there due to trying to get 50/50 custody of his daughter who was dirty,neglected and spent most of her days being ‘home educated’ which was on her tablet in a room by herself all day and a long list of other reasons. Her mother was very manipulative and the cafcass officer was manipulated too I’m guessing which is bizarre considering they should be trained in this. This woman from cafcas was almost at retirement age too with some awful smirk on her face it was terrible . She said in her report that we were scapegoating the child. I don’t see how you are scapegoating a child when you are treating the child as one of your own;cleaning that child who hasn’t had a bath in a week,buying that child vests ,shoes and coats because it’s cold and her mother couldn’t be asked,un knotting their hair because it hasn’t been brushed since they saw you 10 days ago and the child is constantly dirty,sad and withdrawn. It’s just crazy what these people come up with!!

3. Juli 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Corrupt

I've made several reports to the police, child services, NSPCC & told Cafcass about my ex physically abusing my daughter before she took off with her, the fact that my exes family are all on A class drugs, drink heavily all on a daily basis whilst in family homes around there children and I don't want that for my daughter, also my exes brother has been put on the SA register for abusing his exes cousins daughter who was a young child too and my ex is allowing her around him even know he's not allowed around kids, on top of that they keep bringing up my previous court cases saying I've been done for things that I've not, even as going as far to say I'm not in my daughter birth certificate to the court until I cut them off and told the court that this was a lie, I started the court case in the first place but for soem reason they've switched it on me when I've not even done anything, I'm now looking into what I can do about Cafcass and the emergency services like social services, police and NSPCC for negligence also defimation with Cafcass

1. Juli 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

If I could offer less stars I would

If I could offer less stars I would. My sister’s family have had the unpleasant experience of being subject to a CAFCASS officer. The women in question uses the title “Dr”, following a PhD she wrote many years ago. This women is arrogant, insightless and has not grasped the dynamics of the case in order to protect the children. She is loud and abrasive. A 10 year old child commented that she was rude. This woman is within this “profession” for power. She does not have the skills; academic, emotional, or personal, to conduct a sensitive, comprehensive and safe investigation and analysis. Absolute disappointment. “Dr” is someone that is extremely confident. However this is misguided. She is completely lacking in skills to assess risk, and to grasp complex interpersonal dynamics, that are absolutely necessary tools for the job. This women does not appear to have read the background information, and has visited on only two occasions in one year. With this in mind, she feels entitled to form biased judgements. Some reflective space is needed for this Social Worker, as I’m sure it is for many. Fortunately, the Local Authority social worker has been wonderful which I understand (unfortunately) is a rare occurrence.

18. Dezember 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Giving one star is way to good to be…

Giving one star is way to good to be giving these jokers! Worst system in the world create bs about people lie about things for it to go the way they desire! Talk about evil! That's caffcass for you! Nothing to do with been a bitter parent if organisations like this are able to create lies and bs based on pretty much nothing what does that say about the system? Somebody seriously needs toget rid of this! They portray to care for the welfare and safety of children but leave my kids with a narcissistic actor over a loving dad! With no option to see my kids due to the bs they have lied and created! Disgraceful organisation that really needs to be removed from the system!

18. Dezember 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Just not fit for purpose

Just not fit for purpose, the damage these people are doing to some children and parents is just unbelievable. When is the UK government going to do something about this incompitant institution that is causing so much harm to some people in this country. Get a grip Mr Prime Minister. Its absolutely shameful!!!

5. Dezember 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I have created a petition about…

I have created a petition about manditory trauma informed training and standards. I cant post it here, it wont let me, but please look for it on the gov website. lets make this situation better, its a secret national emergancy what is happening nationwide with protecting perpetrators and vilifying victims of abuse and endangering children and enabling permanent damage too safe parents bonds with their children

14. Dezember 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Cafcass Officers are ignorant of child…

Cafcass Officers are ignorant of child psychology, perpetrator behaviour and coercive control. They are capable of destroying family lives due to a lack of sufficient training, poor accountability and refusal to actually listen to the voices of children, which is their whole mandate. Cafcass continue to entertain and promulgate discredited ‘parental alienation’ tropes created by a discredited paedophile, which UK govnt and WHO refute, and CEO of Cafcass CEO is just a plain liar. Officers are incompetent liars. If I could give 0 rate I would.

5. Januar 2026
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Disgusting

Disgusting, disrespectful and Disgraceful company. Should be dissolved.

2. Dezember 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Deeply let down by Cafcass and the Ombudsman – no accountability when it really matters

I am a father involved in family court proceedings in Chelmsford, and my experience with Cafcass has left me with very little faith in the system that is supposed to protect children and support families.

I specifically asked for a Cafcass report because I wanted proper scrutiny and evidence before decisions were made about my time with my children. Instead, what I got felt rushed, careless and, in my view, biased.

The Cafcass officer in Chelmsford interviewed me for about an hour and used a speech-to-text recorder. The final report was full of errors and statements which, in my opinion, were simply not accurate. I had offered my medical records and made it clear they were available – they were never requested or reviewed. Important context about my health and my situation was ignored.

To make matters worse, the report was sent to me late on a Friday afternoon, with a court hearing scheduled for the Monday. Cafcass had around three months to prepare this report, yet chose to leave it to the very last minute. That left me with almost no time to correct inaccuracies or meaningfully respond before the court relied on it.

As a father, and as a man who knows he is a good parent, it is hard not to feel that being a male parent worked against me. That is my honest perception after going through this process.

I did not just accept this. I went to my MP, Marie Gould, and then took my complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. I was told my complaint was about the process, not about the court order itself. The Ombudsman’s own wording says they can look at process – yet in my case they have chosen not to. So Cafcass make serious mistakes, the Ombudsman acknowledges they could look at how those decisions were made, and then simply decide they won’t.

From where I stand as a member of the public and a voter, it feels like these organisations close ranks and are effectively unaccountable, even when their actions shape how and when a parent can see their own children. That is frightening.

I will continue to explore options such as judicial review, but I am under no illusion: for an ordinary person, taking on state bodies is extremely difficult and expensive. And that is exactly why Cafcass, the Ombudsman and government need to do far better.

When an organisation has the power to influence whether a parent tucks their children into bed or only sees them under strict conditions, “good enough” is not good enough. We deserve a system that is accurate, fair, transparent and genuinely open to challenge – not one that brushes legitimate concerns aside

14. März 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

CAFCASS are monsters

CAFCASS are monsters, this organisation needs shutting down. The reviews speak for themselves, majority of 5 and 4 star reviews and not many might I add have even been incorrectly marked as 5 and 4 stars when reading the reviews and should be removed as it’s not accurate for any person reading what these people are actually about. We can’t all be lying and all CAFCASS officers that put children at risk and are guilty of gross negligence and gross missconduct should all be named. An inquest into this organisation and it’s failure towards children that have led to so many child deaths is much needed.

27. November 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

They’re improving

I’ve had another very long review from Cafcass.
I must say, after 10 years and multiple reviews, they’ve improved a lot in my opinion.
Felicia Cunningham from Cafcass was very professional, she always took the time to explain her thoughts and conclusions, she always took the time to listen without interruption and most importantly her recommendations made sense to me.

I take full accountability for allowing myself to get into this mess and I’m grateful that Cafcass allowed me to voice my concerns.

I would like to thank Cafcass for the help and support I’ve received from them in the past 10 years.

I sincerely hope my children will grow to have a healthy relationship with both their families.

I hope to watch them grow to be happy and have their own family someday. Most importantly I hope to give them the one thing I never had growing up; The presence and love of their father.

Again, thank you Cafcass.
Clarence

17. November 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

CAFCASS – Chronically Unresponsive, Unaccountable and Operating on Unsubstantiated Claims

My recent experience with Cafcass showed a level of unprofessionalism and irresponsibility that no parent should ever encounter.

I communicated with Cafcass promptly and consistently. In return, I was ignored for days at a time. Important questions went unanswered. When serious decisions were made about restricting my contact with my daughter, no evidence was provided, no allegations were explained, and I was given no opportunity to respond.

Cafcass removed my contact based entirely on claims that were unsubstantiated, uninvestigated, and never put to me. There was no safeguarding order, no police action, no children’s services instruction. Both the police and social services independently confirmed there was no basis whatsoever for restricting my contact. Despite this, Cafcass still blocked my relationship with my daughter.

To make matters worse, the Cafcass officer who initiated the restriction then went on holiday immediately after making her decision, leaving no one assigned to the case and no mechanism to resolve the situation. For 10 days, there was no communication, no clarity, and no accountability from their side.

Emails to Cafcass, the school, and associated agencies were either met with silence or outright refusal to take responsibility. No one stepped in. No one explained anything. No one provided documents, dates, or evidence to justify the decision. I was simply cut off from my daughter with no lawful order, no safeguarding finding, no due process, and only the co-parent’s claim that any restriction existed.

When the officer finally returned and I was interviewed, instead of acknowledging her actions, I was told it would take another four weeks for a decision — despite the fact that she had made the original, life-changing decision in less than a day based purely on one parent’s allegations.

The court hearing that followed only exposed how deep the systemic issues run. The court sent the wrong time to all parties — telling us 12 while scheduling it for 2 — then rushed through a hearing that barely lasted 30 minutes. I was only allowed to read Cafcass’s outdated reasoning during the hearing, and even that report didn’t include anything from my interview with them. When I tried to explain the situation, I was talked over and cut off. Despite the chaos, the missing information, and the fact that both social services and the police had already confirmed they found no reason for restricting contact, the court still adopted Cafcass’s recommendations in full.

Cafcass claim to act “in the best interests of the child,” but in my experience they act without transparency, without communication, without due process, and with a level of vindictiveness that has no place in any public service role — let alone one with the power to inflict serious emotional harm on children and families. Their behaviour created unnecessary conflict, confusion between agencies, and distress for a child who had absolutely no reason to be separated from a parent.

This organisation needs urgent oversight, clearer standards, and real accountability. What happened in my case should not be happening to any family in this country — yet it is.

Cafcass are now one of the worst-rated organisations on Trustpilot, with over a thousand reviews averaging around one star. That doesn’t happen by accident. It happens because the same failings repeat: zero transparency, poor communication, decisions with no evidence, and parents left completely in the dark while their relationship with their children is disrupted or destroyed.

If Cafcass were not government-backed, they would not survive. No private organisation with this level of complaints, this level of incompetence, and this level of documented failure would still be trading.

Families deserve far better than this. Children certainly deserve better than this.

7. November 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Very bad

Very bad, they ignore evidence and separate siblings and parents and make ridiculous reports and the officers seem hardly educated.

14. November 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

The worst institution to deal with…

The worst institution to deal with children. They write reports on words without fact checking, often lies during interview which only takes 30 min via single phone call.
Where one Cafcass officer doesn't go with rhetoric and sees exactly what's happening, they promptly alter them to align with their preferred narrative, thereby escalating the case to a high-conflict situation.
I primarily encountered cafcass workers who possessed no skills when it comes to family or parenting issues.
Very criminal institution, mainly focused to remove a parent from children's life.

1. August 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I will update my review once I feel…

I will update my review once I feel safe that they have no ability to harm the mental well being of my children and I any further! Advice to everyone - write to ombudsman and report what they have done, we pay taxes for them to destroy children’s lives with un proven allegations/lies of domestic abuse! they need to be shut down

10. November 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Overall these guys don't have a clue…

Overall these guys don't have a clue about children, family dynamics or even what day of the week it is. To some up it up, I feel sorry for anyone who feels the need to work at this place and destroy the lives of thousands of children, parents and grandparents. Corruption is rife amongst this place and the quicker this organisation is investigated and those responsible for the failings are locked up indefinitely, then the better!!!!

2 incompetent CRAPCASS idiots, have contributed to leaving two children without a father or paternal grandparents, for no actual reason. They literally need sacking and to never work with children or families again!!!! Both nice to your face, yet don't have the ability to actually see when they have been played. And if they do, we'll that makes them as emotionally dangerous, as the individual they have sided with.

Well done to you both, you should be proud of yourselves and your lack of brain cells.

5. Januar 2026
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Cafcass put children at risk!

Cafcass have failed my daughter twice. On two separate occasions, we have been through family court due to serious safeguarding concerns. On both occasions, my daughter was refused the opportunity to express her wishes, the Section 7 assessment was not completed, and Cafcass dismissed the safeguarding concerns I raised.

As a result, despite clear risks, the other parent was granted increasing levels of contact each time. It was only after the most recent final hearing that social services themselves had to intervene, recognising that I have done everything I can to protect my daughter, and are now assessing the risks posed by the other parent and implementing a safety plan.

Not only was this shocking enough, but social services reported to Cafcass that they have had EXTENSIVE involvement with that parents other child since 2014, which Cafcass did not consider to be relevant.

The entire experience has been an absolute shambles. Cafcass should be ashamed for the way they continue to fail children who rely on them for protection. The long-term impact this will have on these vulnerable children is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.

I strongly advise other parents who feel Cafcass have failed them to take their complaints to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Cafcass’s own internal complaints process does not properly investigate or take accountability for their serious shortfalls. Only by escalating matters externally is there any hope of real oversight and change.

25. Juni 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung

So funktioniert Trustpilot

Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.

Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.

Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.

Hier ​finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.

Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.

Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.

Erfahren Sie mehr