WIRED UK Bewertungen 

Absolutely biased website. Look at how they do rate masterpieces and high ratings go for horrible ones.

It feels like everyone can publish anything without peer reading or something like that. A Game-Review written by someone who never reviewed any game before, but instead sextoys. Ok. The review itself goes full hate on JK Rowling. Ok. It doesn't mention nearly anything about the game, gameplay, story and so on. I guess I am not reading a review, but someones article who got somehow hurt by JK Rowling without knowing her despite her books and tweets I guess. Well. Welcome to our modern world. We called ppl like that Emos back than and most of them were between the age of 14-19, but after that it stopped because you grew up. Today people don't seem to grow up and stay in their hateful Teenstage for the rest of their lifes. Ok. But don't let them write reviews then. Thanks.

lgbtqia+ propaganda site, you are what's wrong with journalism these days.

I must express my deep disappointment with Wired.com, as I have found their articles to be biased and factually incorrect.
I believe that their biases have led to a decline in the quality of their articles and a loss of trust from their readers. In my personal experience, I have found Wired.com to be a disservice to its readers.

I urge others to approach this website with caution and to be aware of the potential for biased and inaccurate reporting.

Woke propaganda and emotional rant about Hogwarts Legacy and JK Rowling disguised as "Review". Absolute trash. Jaina Rodriguez Grey should be fired from Wired.

For Howard's Legacy and your woke propaganda. Fire your woke staff and hire normal straight people with a brain and non-biased forward thinking.

I can't rate them any lower. Their "reviews" have been degenerating into OP EDs for some time now, but their latest "review" of "Hogwarts Legacy" is the straw that broke the camel's back.
That entire article had only vague 1-line mentions about graphics, settings, and plot. Nothing about gameplay, mechanics, performance, optimization, and average length/duration. I learned nothing about the game.
You do not get to title your articles as "reviews" and then rant about some author that had 0 input on the game being reviewed. This does not help with purchase decisions.

Proper joke that is, noting more than a small and scared uneducated people role play journalists.

Biased, unscientific, racist newspaper.

i would give zero if i can. Click bait and untrustworthy news.

Letting incompetent people speak and review products is simply not acceptable for a well established website. Disgusting

I can't rate them any lower. Their "reviews" have been degenerating into OP EDs for some time now, but their latest "review" of "Hogwarts Legacy" is the straw that broke the camel's back.
That entire article had only vague 1-line mentions about graphics, settings, and plot. Nothing about gameplay, mechanics, performance, optimization, and average length/duration. I learned nothing about the game.
You do not get to title your articles as "reviews" and then rant about some author that had 0 input on the game being reviewed. This does not help with purchase decisions.

The Wired decided to go woke and review content based on imaginary stories instead of being objective. In response I invoke the same uno card and score Wired the same. Rock bottom journalism.

Incapable of putting thorough, unbiased reviews without getting political. None of the ratings have any meaningful values. Very little research is done before any article is written.

Not objective at all. Biased reporting based on their own agenda

Very unprofessional reviews and cannot be trusted, just have their own agendas behind every article.

Biased review of a product by writing nothing of said product. They do NOT have the capability to write proper review. There's nothing about its gameplay at all. It should not even worthy titled as review. Such disgusting act of jorno.