Discrimination concern ignored and escalated into disproportionate ban
I stayed at Premier Inn Derby City Centre (Cathedral Quarter) during the annual Tomb Raider Derby event at QUAD, and my experience with the in-house Thyme restaurant and subsequent handling by Whitbread has been extremely disappointing.
The initial issue began as a payment dispute in the Thyme restaurant during a very busy evening connected to the event. What escalated the situation was not the payment itself, but how it was handled. During this interaction, I was told that my “presence, height, and gender are threatening”, followed by the comment “if you apologise, everything will be forgotten.” I found this deeply uncomfortable and inappropriate, particularly in a customer-facing environment.
Rather than addressing this concern, the situation appeared to worsen. I was asked to leave, and later I was informed that I had been banned from the restaurant and hotel. What followed was even more troubling: this ban was then used as the basis for me being banned from the Tomb Raider Derby event at QUAD, despite the original incident having taken place outside the event and venue. This felt disproportionate and disconnected from what actually occurred.
When I tried to seek clarity, cooperation was minimal. Requests for explanation were repeatedly redirected, and concerns about the discriminatory comment were never substantively addressed. Internal notes later disclosed to me (in redacted form) appeared to present a one-sided narrative, focusing on characterisations of my behaviour while omitting relevant context, including the comments made to me.
I was also repeatedly told that the police would be called, which felt intimidating in the circumstances, particularly as there was no allegation of violence or criminal behaviour. To my knowledge, no police report exists, yet references to police involvement were later used in correspondence, further reinforcing a narrative that I believe was unfair.
What was especially distressing was the sense that information about me had been discussed informally with other customers, contributing to gossip and reputational harm. From my perspective, a situation that should have been handled quietly and professionally instead escalated into something far larger, with lasting consequences.
I am sharing this review because of the lack of accountability, transparency, and proportionality shown throughout the process. Large hospitality companies should be able to manage disputes calmly, investigate discrimination concerns properly, and avoid allowing narratives to form without balanced review.
I hope Whitbread reflects on how situations like this are handled in the future, particularly when events, safeguarding, and reputational impacts on customers are involved.








