Qubit Capital Bewertungen 81

Very unprofessional communication with cold emails. Reaching out with zero valuable information, not answering, not being able to communicate their goal and sending mails meant for other people to me.

If these basics go wrong, I cannot imagine they bring other valuable stuff to the table

The pitch deck refinement added significant value to our fundraising efforts. Following the improvements, we received strong interest from investors, which translated into multiple follow-up calls. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Ameya and the team for their support.

Throughout the process, they demonstrated a deep and nuanced understanding of the EdTech industry. The “ask” slide was sharpened effectively, and the appendix was thoughtfully restructured, enabling investors to review key data independently without requiring a step-by-step walkthrough. This greatly enhanced the overall workflow and exceeded my expectations.

We have had several meetings with VCs and Jay our rep is on top of everything even when I am not.

Our financial model was weak, so the team fixed it. I thought it only needed small changes. But they made the numbers more strict and clear. They highlighted the key numbers that investors care about. We walked to 4 investor recently. We got second meetings with 2 of them. That's better than what we did alone in the last 6 months.

This is an update from my first review of Mar 23, 2025. Qubit completed their outreach to all investors on their platform as of Apr 23, 2025, notified us, and asked us to continue keeping them updated. They were not very responsive on follow ups after that. From the experience of others, it seems that their automation may be successful for some - if it is - it is likely within the first six months. Otherwise, expect to write off your fee paid to them after 12 months, because our experience with their follow up is that they don't continue trying on your behalf.

Update in response to Qubit's reply below on May 6, 2025:
I see Qubit's reply implies our expectation was unreasonable, that the engagement had an agreed completion date, and the engagement was closed over a year ago. I do not agree with their statement "As you highlighted... our engagement was completed as per the agreed scope...", where I believe their statement is incorrect. I quote from our engagement letter with Qubit - "11. The Client should expect their engagement with Qubit to last for approx 4 months or the closure of the funding round whichever is earlier." We have not managed to close the funding round and are still actively raising. We never heard from Qubit that they considered the engagement was closed. We did reach out to them about what they would continue to do and never got a response. In the initial sales discussions we were assured repeatedly that we would be supported as long as it took to close the funding round, not a close of engagement after a certain period of time. I confirm we got 9 investor calls in 12 months with no follow up. That is legitimately an investor decision. I do dispute Qubit's assertion that they were not obliged to continue trying, based on our initial discussions. What I can say then is the Qubit investor database was not well-matched to the energy and climate sector we were in, despite their initial confidence they could match us.

Our initial ask wasn't very clear, as we have only outlined a rough figure without much detail. Qubit helped us structured a proper use of funds-plan, linking the spending to clear, milestones. This made our discussions with investors feel more focused and practical. The added clarity was appreciated, and overall it helped strengthen our approach. A useful experience, especially if you're not very comfortable with financial planning.

Mridul. I told him straight up I don't want cold outreach and I only care about warm intros. He didn't argue with me, Just worked with what we had. The outreach copy sounded lie ti came from me (not a template). and the meetings we got were mostly relevant. One of those conversations turned into money in the bank. Took longer than I wanted but it happened.

A couple of the early conversations were not quite our lane but they adjusted the list after feedback and the next set matched better. What helped was that they didn't just swap names randomly. They actually went back to our criteria and filtered for founds that had done deals in our space before. Small thing but it made the calls feel more productive and we stopped wasting time on intros that were never going to go anywhere. So far satified.

Maithili and Aditya have been a great help, putting all their effort into achieving the goal we have set for ourselves, with intelligence and efficiency.

Do not use this company, they are a waste of time. Their system is simply using your own linkedin account to send generic emails to their list of investors. You may get one or two responses but usually they are firms looking to sell their services or provide loans. We never had any serious interest from the investors and whilst getting investment is not guaranteed, you would be better off paying more to established investment houses. Tney also offer a refund if you get no interest but to them interest is defined has one or more call or request for a pitch deck, often from people looking to sell to you rather than invest.

We engaged Qubit Capital with a clear agreement: the onboarding fee would be refunded if no meaningful investor conversations were generated.

While some meetings were arranged, they were largely misaligned with our sector (e.g. funds focused on female founders, consumer/retail, real estate/renewables). As a result, no real investor traction was achieved.

The core issue was poor targeting, not lack of effort.

What is most concerning is that these irrelevant meetings were later used to justify denying the refund.

After this experience, we replicated the same outreach process internally using tools like Apollo and Smartlead, achieving comparable (if not better) results with full control over targeting.

Overall:

outreach volume ≠ quality

targeting was not aligned with our business

refund clause was not honored as expected

Would recommend future clients to define very clearly what qualifies as a relevant investor before engaging.

QUBIT has shown market expertise and a willingness to do the work!

The staff deserves my thanks.
Weekly replies from investors are now being received consistently whereas we previously saw almost none.
Thaank QubitCapital

The team really knows there stuff when it comes to finance PR, and we recieved some excellent coverage that helped us a lot, even if I had to email them a couple of times to recieve a response. Arigato for the great work.

Aditya, Maithili and the whole input team to our case was very professional and fast in crasping what Viomba is all about and what we're looking at this point from our investor prospects.

J'ai payé pour leur service mais au final c'est juste des envois froids et pas de vrais contacts. Honnêtement j'ai perdu mon temps et mon argent avec eux.

They do not have a warm client system. They used Ai to connect to your email and send emails out to also warm your email, and in between those bot to bot emails, they send out emails to investors. They only offer you one meeting, and if you get a meeting then our refund is bye bye from their services, even if it was a no. They also will do an evaluation on your company or business that you have. Then they make a presentation, which I had to fix an update myself. The presentation and company evaluation is 5k in total. Check the rest of their reviews they all lack detail. They don't even have a google review page either. On reddit they also do not have a lot of great things said about them and if there is. Lack of detail. Use your own judgements.

That is all their service provides. Honestly you could do the same with out them and save 5k. Presentation are easy to make now with Ai, so you dont need to pay for it. Email marketing, you can also do that yourself, and with investment companies, most have a form you need to fill out on their site. In the end, there is no one better to do these type of things than yourself. In my opinion it was a waste of cash and experience, but all i got was experience of the process. Who knows, maybe I would have had better success if I was not a video game that needs funding,

I work with Badri and the Qubit team. They started by helping build out good materials for investor calls. Badri has done a great job of keeping me informed and making sure we have 2 to 5 investor calls per week. Most have been very relevant and interested in our investment. Compared to a previous firm, Qubit has been MUCH more effective in generating quality leads and making sure I am not wasting my time. Thank you Badri and Qubit team.

Badri from Qubit Capital has been a tremendous asset in our fundraising journey. He connected us with high-quality, relevant investors and provided strategic insights that helped us sharpen our pitch and clearly communicate our value.

His advice was always timely, specific, and grounded in real investor expectations. Thanks to his support, we were able to focus our outreach, improve our materials, and make faster progress.

Highly recommended for any founder looking to raise smart capital with the right partners — and save time doing it.

The entirety of our investor outreach initiative was managed by the team at Qubit. Investors were chosen with care, and all logistics, introductions, and follow ups were handled so well that every discussion felt purposeful. Our financial model was also taken and refined to a degree that was impressive to our internal staff and to outside investors.
Concise summaries about the person we were meeting were provided before every call, enabling us to steer the discussions with assurance. Ultimately, the professional execution of the process made certain that fundraising aided our expansion rather than hindering it.