PlagiarismDetector.net Bewertungen 25

Textos para educação infantil focam no desenvolvimento integral, usando narrativas curtas, lúdicas e afetivas, com vocabulário simples e temas do cotidiano (animais, família, brincadeiras). Estruturas rimadas, parlendas e textos fatiados facilitam a alfabetização e a leitura. O objetivo é incentivar a imaginação e a oralidade.

best site to rely on when doing research programs

I can't cancel my subscription there is no option in their website to cancel the subscription, they have withdrew from my card and I didn't know moreover I can't cancel ittttt!!!

Recently I paid for Plagiarism Detector and also the AI Detector. The Plagiarism part works fine, if a little bit slow at times. The AI Detector, on the other hand, is another story, it seems to return most often 100% human, occasionally other results on the same text, a bit random!. Oh the occasions where the results are not 100% the report does not highlight the AI part, so in the end not a lot of use!
I will be requesting a refund for the AI detection part if I can get the help desk to respond!

PlagiarismDetector.net is one of the most accurate and user-friendly plagiarism checkers I’ve used. It quickly scans text, highlights duplicate content, and shows exact sources for easy correction. The interface is clean, results are fast, and the reports are detailed yet easy to understand. Whether you’re a student, blogger, or professional writer, this tool ensures your content stays 100% original. Highly recommended!

Horrible. Detecta plagios donde no los hay y se inventa las fuentes. Una basura

I have been trying to contact them for help on different PC browsers and then my phone, but their customers online support service is having an internal server problem.

This is not acceptable, considering I am asking about money I spent to get a service over a week ago and this is their only line of contact.

Here is how well their AI detector works. I asked ChatGPT the following:

"can you write a random body of text that would probably get caught by an AI detector?"

And I get this response:

"Certainly! Here's an example of a body of text that might resemble something an AI detector could flag due to stylistic patterns often associated with machine-generated content:

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, the interplay between artificial intelligence and societal growth continues to drive unprecedented levels of innovation. The ubiquitous integration of AI systems into various industries has led to significant transformations in operational efficiency, productivity, and decision-making processes. Moreover, the ethical considerations surrounding these advancements remain a focal point of discourse among scholars and practitioners alike. From healthcare diagnostics to autonomous transportation, the possibilities appear boundless, yet the challenges are equally compelling. The necessity for robust regulatory frameworks, transparent algorithms, and unbiased data sets cannot be overstated, as these elements are pivotal to ensuring equitable outcomes across diverse populations.

This text uses general, formal, and polished language with abstract ideas—traits that are sometimes overemphasized in AI-generated writing."

I tried pasting the ENTIRE response, including the "Certainly!" bit at the beginning and the last sentence at the end. This website says it's 100% human-written content.

I think this website is just meant to optimize traffic with SEO so they can make money on ads. Doesn't bother to serve the intended purpose.

The plagiarism checker found the most random things that they said I plagiarized but I had never even seen those sites before. Two of the three sites didn't even make sense how I plagiarized them, and the third was only in the link! I used to use this every time I wrote an essay, but now I'll be more wary of trusting it. I do use the AI checker often and it normally gives pretty accurate results. If you're reading the reviews to decide whether or not to use it, just try it out! It seems like most people here either love it or hate it, but see for yourself. Also, it always takes forever to load, but that might just be my school Chromebook.

Do not trust with AI checking!

After my wife received a piece of work back from her tutor saying she had to write it in her own words as a massive chunk had been detected as written by AI (screenshots had been included too). I decided to do a bit of investigating. I used several different AI detection free sites and only plagiarismdetector.net came up with it being written by AI at a 100% detection rate. I then plugged the various questions into several different AI sites (Gemini, Copilot, Copy.ai, AskGPT) and then pasted the answers they gave into plagiarismdetector.net and it came back with it being 100% human written!
To add insult to injury they make this claim
"Our online AI detector is a competent tool that provides you with flawless AI detection output in no time. The ChatGPT checker offers you guaranteed results and can be shared as evidence without any fear or worry."

If educational institutions are using this as the be all and end all of AI detection, then there will be a lot of people that are getting failing grades for no reason!

Detector de plagio y de inteligencia artificial tremendamente fiable y que funciona a la perfección. Es cierto que hay que esperar un poquito al resultado, pero para mí esto es importante. Me da la seguridad de que se está haciendo una búsqueda a fondo. Totalmente recomendable para cuando cites en tus trabajos académicos sea de manera correcta y con la tranquilidad de no realizar plagios.

As a blogger, I need to check the plagiarism status of the posts I have published quite often. However, extracting text from them and pasting it into a plagiarism checker becomes a hassle. Thanks to the check by URL feature of plagiarismdetector. net, I can simply enter the URL and conduct plagiarism test. It's quite efficient and makes the process much faster!

I'm not fond of saving my documents on computer storage. Thus, all my documents are stored on Dropbox. When I came across this tool, I thought, I'll have to save the file on my computer first, but its feature of importing files from Dropbox proved to be a blessing. I was able to directly upload a file through my Dropbox account and it was quite easy.

My experience with plagiarismdetector.net had been good. Its paraphrasing tool proved to be a great resource for rephrasing formal content. Its variety of suggestions help me choose the words I find suitable for my text, and it makes my job a lot easier.

I've always been skilled at communicating my ideas to others via writing. So, I got into blogging almost a year ago. However, I just came upon a Website that has been copying my work in another language. I've read that plagiarismDetector.net offers accurate plagiarism detection across a number of languages. I checked the content of the foreign language, got accurate results, and generated a plagiarism report, which I have already used to file a complaint with Google.

Finally, a plagiarism detector that works with all popular types of text files. Whether I want to check plagiarism in a. doc,.docx, .pdf, or .txt file, I can do all that without requiring any file conversions. Furthermore, the flexibility to access files from both local and cloud storage has been quite helpful for me.

comprobé con un texto plagio y salio 80% plagio y uno que yo misma hice y salio 100% es UNA MENTIRA

I wish I could give 0 star. I needed the API key for a project so I purchased the product. But then I realised they actually didn't provide the API key to you automatically so I requested for a refund because I paid for a service that wasn't delivered in a timely manner. Waited a day to hear back and they "emailed" the API key to me. Tried the API key, 403 error. Then the team told me to take a screenshot so they could refund me. I did, but then they told me to try it again as the key worked on their end. Frankly, as a customer, all trust is gone, and the fact that I had to email them 10+ emails just for a simple service that I paid for shows they genuinely do not care about customer experience. By the end, I got my refund finally, and I also got a very condescending reply from their CS team:

************************************************
Actually we don't want you to debug for us .we give you cURL example for connecting and yes we are seeing you are not interested in our tool.

If you simply write an email that you don't want to use our tool and API we will refund you very next email.
This is all email and communication. We just want to tell you that our API is working well and perfectly .

we give a little advice next time if you want any refund from any tool you have paid just tell them the truth

Your refund is proceed now and it will take 3 to 5 working days to appear in your account
************************************************

Genuinely do not understand why this company still exists.