Bondreview Bewertungen 

I am writing this review to express my extreme disappointment with Bond Review, whose recent review of OSMAI FX contained demonstrably false allegations. These false claims have significantly damaged our company's reputation and caused undue stress and concern to our team.

The specific allegations made by Bond Review were accusing OSMAI FX of being a Ponzi Scheme. These claims are completely untrue and have no basis in reality. We have a long and proud history of delivering a top tier investment platform to our clients.

Furthermore, we have third-party verified results to support our performance. Unlike Bond Review, we maintain transparency and open communication, making ourselves easily contactable.

We are deeply troubled that Bond Review would publish such damaging information without making any attempt to verify it with us. Had they contacted us, we could have promptly addressed their concerns and provided evidence to support our practices.

We believe in holding ourselves and others accountable for providing accurate information. Bond Review's actions, fall far short of this standard. We urge Bond Review to take immediate action to remove the false information and implement stricter fact-checking procedures to prevent similar situations in the future.

We remain confident in our company's practices and our commitment to our customers. We encourage anyone considering our services to do their own research and learn more about the positive experiences our clients have had with OSMAI FX.

Website is filled with inaccuracies and mindless rants from a bitter and twisted individual!

No one of sane mind will believe this nonsense

BondReview has provent to be an invaluable resource.

It has warned lenders about and exposed many loan notes borrowers and their duplicitous introducers and security trustees that have collaborated to pilfer tens of millions of pounds each from retail lenders, ranging from Magna Global to High Street Group to Accumulate Capital to Farrbury Capital Partners.

Read the archives of this blog and the warnings that Brev gave about nascent loan notes ended up being accurate.

The reason for the negative comments here is that the miscreants who the blog exposes are obviously not happy with the website.

Bond review is a scam. It is nonsense written by a moron in a little room in a rented flat.

Sham company trying to discredit competitors - class action legal case about to be launched against Jamal Merchant for libel and loss of earnings, (who hides behind the website and provides no contact details or accreditations on the website itself). Watch this space.

The person behind Bond Review is an individual by the name of Jamal Merchant who lives in London SW19 8EN.

Regulated by the FCA#: 657690 an author of One Enduring Lesson.

This website is fake .... no ownership of the site is made clear.
The site was originally created to promote investments but they soon realised that it was more productive to try and discredit other companies which would lead to investors reach out to bondreview for advise but unbeknown to these investors their details would be passed onto scam companies operated in southampton....

the truth will come out watch this space....

Think again.
A quick whois search of the domain name on netim or any domain provider shows:
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLP. [Tag = GODADDY]
URL: GoDaddy

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 15-Dec-2017
Expiry date: 15-Dec-2019
Last updated: 01-Dec-2018

As an approved advisor I will say that some of what they have written appears to be coherent, BUT It is disturbing that a company that paints it self as trustworthy has:
1. No contact details,
2. Hidden their domain ownership and has
3. no FCA backing.
4. No apparent financial acumen

Who are they?

Very cowboy. It seems to be either competitors trying to flush the competition or... a nobody with an over inflated opinion.

My Attempts to contact them have been null.

BE CAREFUL. I personally never value the opinions of someone hiding behind the internet. The companies they have slandered at least have a real address offices and contact details.

I can not say the same for the bondreview.co.uk